Greece, Bulgaria and the
Macedonian Question
Cutting through the Rhetoric
By Risto Stefov
rstefov@hotmail.com
January 28, 2007
I have often heard
references to the Macedonian question without
understanding what it really means. Why is the Macedonian
question so elusive and mysterious and why has it been
thrown around for so long?
The Macedonian question was not a question that
Macedonians have asked but rather a question the Great
Powers were asking during late nineteenth century when
Macedonia was still occupied by the last remnants of the
Ottoman Empire. Simply put the Macedonian question was,
“What will happen to the Macedonian territories and the
people living on those territories when theOttoman Empire
ceases to exist?”
Obviously the Macedonian question was answered in 1912,
1913 when Macedonia was occupied, partitioned and annexed
byGreece, Serbia and Bulgaria. Or was it?
If the Macedonian question was answered then, why does it
still linger on? And better still, why has it evolved? In
view of what is happening today with regards to the
Greek-Macedonian name dispute and the Bulgarian refusal to
recognize the Macedonian ethnicity and language, it’s time
once again to ask, “What is the Macedonian question of
today?”
If the Macedonian question was satisfactorily answered by
the division of Macedonia and by declaring that only
Greeks, Serbs and Bulgarians live in the geographic
territories of Macedonia, why then do we today have a
sovereign and independent Macedonian State with no less
than 1.8 million people declaring themselves to be ethnic
Macedonians? Likewise if all those people living in the
Macedonian territories that Greece annexed in 1913 were
Greeks then why do we today have Macedonians living
inGreece? Similarly, if everyone in Bulgarian annexed
Macedonia were Bulgarians, why then today do we have
Macedonians living in Bulgaria?
We can all bury our heads in the sand and keep on
believing “no Macedonians exist” to the satisfaction of
Greece and Bulgaria, or we can wake up to the reality that
ethnic Macedonians do exist not only in the Republic of
Macedonia but in all of geographic Macedonia, including
the Greek and Bulgarian annexed territories.
Being made aware of that reality, then what will the “new
Macedonian question” be that the new Great Powers should
be asking?
Before answering this question, we should take a look at
what was done to “answer” the original “Macedonian
question” and what has changed to lead to the “new
Macedonian question”.
Before the breakup of the Ottoman Empire the Great Powers
were preoccupied with how to maintain political stability
in the region. Being itself a Great Power, as the Ottoman
Empire began to break up, the other Great Powers struggled
to maintain a balance of power without themselves losing
influence and at the same time looking for ways to expand
their own influence. There was agreement between the
Powers that should the Ottoman Empire collapse they would
not allow its replacement to be a single state or another
Great Power. Thus the “Eastern Question” was born which
simply put stated, “What will happen to the lands and
people when the Ottoman Empire ceases to exist?” The only
acceptable solution was to replace the Ottoman lands with
smaller states that could not possibly unite. In other
words “create a number of smaller, equal sized,
politically diverse” states that would oppose one another
and remain loyal to the Great Powers that created them.
As the Ottoman Empire began to wear down at its fringes,
Greece and Serbia were born. As it continued to collapse
greaterBulgaria was born but it was a short lived birth.
The Powers could not agree on San Stefano Bulgaria because
for one, it was much larger than the other two newly
created states and being created by Russia, Bulgaria would
show loyalty to Russia and would allow Russia, a rival
Great Power, greater influence in the Balkans as well as
access to the Mediterranean waters, something the Western
Powers did not want. Instead, a smaller Bulgaria was
created and the Ottoman collapse was somewhat stabilized
and its territory in the Balkans reduced to present day
geographical Macedonia, Albania, Thrace and European
Turkey (the Dardanelles).
By now no one had any doubts that the remainder of the
Ottoman Empire was going to collapse, it was a matter of
time. This created new worries for the Great Powers, “What
to do with the remainder of the lands, especially with
Macedonia.” This gave birth to the “Macedonian Question”.
Simply put “what will happen to Macedonia and the
Macedonian people” when the Ottoman Empire disappears? Of
course, as I mention earlier, the problem was solved by
allowing Greece, Serbia and Bulgaria to annex parts of
Macedonia and its people. Since Macedonia was an existing
entity with defined borders, a long and illustrious
history, and with ethnic Macedonians living on it, it was
difficult to find dividing lines. So Macedonia’s
eventuality was decided by conflict. The three states were
allowed to simultaneously invade Macedonia and whichever
parts they liberated by evicting the Turks they would get
to keep for themselves. The invasion took place in 1912
and resulted in the successful eviction of the last
remnants of the Ottoman Empire. Unfortunately none of the
three states were happy with the territories they gained
so once again they renewed the conflict in 1913 resulting
in the current partition and annexation of Macedonia which
exists to this day.
No matter what Greece and Bulgaria claim today about how
they acquired their part of Macedonia, it is a well known
fact that Macedonian territories were a prize from the
spoils of war. The 1913 Treaty of Bucharest, and how it
was achieved, is a living testament that Greece, Serbia
and Bulgaria fought over Macedonia and gained its lands by
conflict. No historical claims were ever made prior to or
during the signing of the 1913 Treaty of Bucharest.
It is a well known fact that neither Greece, Serbia, nor
Bulgaria ever existed before as sovereign states. Bulgaria
and Serbiaexisted as empires encompassing parts of
Macedonian territories but it is well understood that
these territories were occupied by force and never
belonged to them. Greece on the other hand had never
before occupied or owned Macedonian lands. That is
whyGreece has resorted to using the ancient Macedonians
from 2,300 years ago to claim “historic rights” to
Macedonian territories.Greece it seems can only claim
legitimacy to Macedonian territories and to the Macedonian
heritage if it can prove to the world that the “Ancient
Macedonians were Greek”. While ignoring the reality of how
it obtained Macedonian territories, Greece has taken the
argument back 2,300 years and is fighting a war of words,
semantics, as to who is the real heir to the Macedonian
heritage. Greeceis ignoring the facts that Macedonians
lived in Macedonia for countless generations or at least
1,500 years by its own accounts.Greece knows very well
that no one cares about what happened 2,300 years ago. And
why does it matter? Why argue semantics while ignoring
reality? Arguing semantics suits Greece and Bulgaria
perfectly because while the Macedonians are arguing over
semantics Greece and Bulgaria (1) continue to make them
look like fools and (2) continue to benefit from
Macedonia’s occupation to the detriment of its true owners
the Macedonian people.
Let’s clarify some things. First and foremost Macedonians
are people with legal rights and privileges no matter what
Greece andBulgaria call them. Second, these people
indisputably lived in Macedonia for at least 1,500 years
which is more than enough to qualify them as the
indigenous people of Macedonia. These people, according to
international law, have the right to self identify in
whatever way or means they see fit. So what is the problem
with Greece and Bulgaria?
The real problem here is not whether Macedonians qualify
to be called Macedonians but rather, whether Greece has
the right and can prove it has the right to the Macedonian
heritage. Does Greece truly have a case by claiming
“Macedonia is Greek” on account that the “Ancient
Macedonians may or may not have been Greek in 400 BC”?
Greece only has a case as long as Macedonians believe it
has a case and continue to argue with Greece over
frivolous issues! Do the Macedonian people have a case
against Greece for losing their lands to Greece because
Greece chose to illegally occupy Macedonia by force in
1912, 1913? Yes they do! If Macedonians stop fighting with
Greece about 2,400 year old issues and begin to focus
their efforts on today’s real issues then they can expect
to gain international attention and achieve their rights
as Macedonians living on this planet!
Even though Macedonia was served on a platter to Greece,
Serbia and Bulgaria by the Great Powers in 1913 by the
Treaty of Bucharest and again in 1919 by the Treaty of
Versailles, does not change the fact that Greece, Serbia
and Bulgaria gained Macedonian lands illegally by force
and without the consent of the Macedonian people.
Do the Macedonian people have a strong case against Greece
and Bulgaria? The answer is yes! Macedonians can prove
that Macedonians have been evicted from their lands and
their lands have been confiscated only because they are
Macedonians. Macedonians can prove that both Greece and
Bulgaria have broken treaties which Greece and Bulgaria
have signed to provide Macedonians minority rights.
Macedonians can prove that Greece and Bulgaria continue to
disobey international law by not recognizing the ethnic
Macedonians in their respective states. Case and point,
the Greek State passed a law in 1988 allowing all Greeks
by birth to return to Greece but not the 28,000 Macedonia
refugee children, refugees from the Greek Civil War. These
were children between the ages of 2 and 14. They are not
criminals or agents of foreign states. Greece has yet to
explain why these children, who now are all over 60 years
old, are not allowed to return. Why is Greece on one hand
claiming that everyone who lived in Greece since 1928 is
Greek and on the other hand it passes a law that
discriminates against non-Greeks who supposedly do not
exist? Greece will not allow Macedonians to return to
Greece because Greece has confiscated and sold or given
away their lands to the colonists it imported from Asia
Minor in the 1920s and is still importing to this day.
The name dispute between Macedonia and Greece is a
fabricated issue, fabricated by Greece to take attention
away from its dismal human rights record towards its
minorities, especially its Macedonian minority which
Greece has robbed of its heritage.Greece has created this
issue to keep Macedonians on the defensive and away from
seeking compensation for their lands or to fight for their
human rights as ethnic Macedonians and as citizens of that
state. There is no international law or precedence that
would allow legally or morally for a state to evict people
from their lands and rob them of their property and ethnic
rights based on 2,400 year old “ambiguous claims”.
Besides, how do we know for certain and how can we prove
that the modern Greeks truly have legitimate rights to the
Macedonian lands and heritage? How do we know that the
Macedonians themselves who lived in Macedoniafor at least
1,500 years have no rights to Macedonian lands and the
Macedonian heritage? Are we to take the word of a state
who denies the Macedonian peoples’ existence? Are we to
believe Greece, a state that has robbed the ethnic
Macedonians of their ethnic rights? Who has evicted
Macedonians from their own homes? Who has changed all the
Macedonian names? Who has tried to make Macedonians into
Greeks by force? I think not!
Since Macedonians are placed in a position where they have
to justify their identity wouldn’t you say it is only fair
that Greeks be put through the same scrutiny? How can a
person by simply saying that they are “Greek” own the
right to both the Greek and Macedonian heritage yet a
person who says they are Macedonian has no rights at all,
not even the right to call him or herself Macedonian?
How did all this start and what has changed since?
As mentioned earlier, Greece is a product of Great Power
intervention. It was artificially created for the first
time in 1829 from the ashes of the crumbling Ottoman
Empire. I am saying “artificially created” because most
states when created are modeled after something vibrant
and living, like a living culture or a practicing
tradition. The language a newly created state adopts for
its people is usually a living language or the mother
language of the people. If more than one language exists,
it’s usually the language of the majority that is adopted.
Some states to be fair to all people are bi-lingual or
even multi-lingual. Greece, on the other hand, was modeled
after a dead culture which existed 2,400 years ago. The
language the Greek state adopted for its people was also a
dead language which was only preserved by the Ottoman
administration and the Orthodox Church. The name “Greece”
itself is also a non-Greek word. It is a Latin word.
When Greece was created for the first time there was no
Greek ethnicity. The 19th century ethnicities that
comprised the raw material for the modern Greek state were
Albanians, Vlachs, Turks, Macedonians and other Slav
speakers, Christians from Asia Minor, Gypsies and other
ethnic minorities. Each ethnicity that comprised the
so-called “Greek ethnos” was not Greek and each spoke a
unique language different from the others.
It is understandable that in order to unify these various
people under one nation the Greek state had to undertake
some measures in order to keep a balance between the needs
of the individual against those of the state.
Unfortunately, in its zeal to create a mythical nation
modeled after a dead culture which only could be viewed as
ideal, Greece went too far. It not only literally
destroyed what was real but it also attempted to erase the
peoples’ collective memory about their current culture,
language and history and replace it with an ideal and
fictitious one. For example in Macedonia, after Greece
consolidated its control over the people, it initiated a
denationalization process by eliminating the spoken and
written form of the Macedonian language and replaced it
with the dead language it adopted for its own people. It
destroyed all records, books, monuments, religious icons,
even tombstones with Macedonian writing. It changed
peoples’ names and gave the people new and Greek sounding
names. It changed all the names of the cities, towns,
villages, lakes, rivers, mountains and roads to make them
look “ancient Greek”. The prohibition of the Macedonian
language and identity as well as the name changes were
enforced by the passing of laws which exist and are
enforced to this day.
In other words, Greece is Greek today not by birthright or
any legal means but simply by enforcing an idea, the idea
that everyone who lives in Greece is Greek.
Unlike Greece which created its “ethnos” by destroying the
true ethnicities of its people, Macedonia has a living and
vibrant Macedonian ethnicity. Ethnic Macedonians in the
entire region of geographic Macedonia have a mother tongue
comprising of at least 26 dialects. Macedonians have a
living language which is at least 1,500 years old. In
spite of Greek attempts to eradicate it, the Macedonian
language has survived and is widely spoken today. The
publication of the Abecedar, a Macedonian language primer,
published by the Greek state itself in 1925 is a testament
that Macedonians and their Macedonian language existed in
Greece.
Macedonians in Greece and Bulgaria have refused to join
the newly created “ethnos” for various reasons. The
primary reason is because they are not Bulgarians or
Greeks. Remember Macedonia was occupied and partitioned by
foreign forces without Macedonian consent. In other words,
no one asked the Macedonians if they wanted their country
to be occupied and partitioned. There are no treaties
signed by Macedonians giving Greece and Bulgaria
permission to annex Macedonian territories. On top of
that, no one asked the Macedonians if they wanted to
become Greeks or Bulgarians voluntarily. Macedonians were
forced into declaring themselves what they were not under
duress. They were forced to give up their own ethnic
identity for the sake of joining the cult of their
occupiers. Yes, “occupiers”!
Let’s face reality here. What the Greeks and Bulgarians
did was not exactly pleasant for the Macedonian people.
Upon their occupation of Macedonian territories, both the
Greek and Bulgarian state executed Macedonians on masse,
evicted Macedonians from their homes and both states
forcibly attempted to denationalize, Hellenize and
Bulgarize the Macedonian population. Greecewent further
and changed the names of people and places and gave away
Macedonian lands to foreign colonists. How can Macedonians
forget that? Even those Macedonians who chose the “Greek
way” were not above been systemically discriminated.Greece
has a file on everyone and if a person has Macedonian
roots he or she is viewed with suspicion and prohibited
from achieving higher education or high positions in the
military or in government. So really where is the
incentive for Macedonians to turn into Greeks? The 1914
Carnegie report is a testament of what Greece and Bulgaria
did upon the occupation and annexation ofMacedonia. When
war broke out in the Balkans in 1912 and 1913, the
Carnegie Endowment dispatched a commission on a fact
finding mission. The mission consisted of seven prominent
members from the United States, Britain, France, Germany,
Austria-Hungary and Russia. Among them was the
distinguished journalist Henry N. Brailsford, author of
the book "Macedonia its Races and their Future". A report
was written and testifies to the atrocities committed by
these states against the Macedonian people!
What has changed since then?
Since Macedonia’s occupation and partition, Serbian
occupied Macedonia saw a resurgence of the Macedonian
language and culture as Serbia slowly softened its
stronghold on Macedonia. With the advent of the Yugoslav
federation, Macedonia took its rightful place as a
republic inside Yugoslavia. The people chose to call their
republic “The Peoples’ Republic of Macedonia” and their
language “Macedonian” to which Greece had no objection.
There are schoolbooks in Greece that attest to the fact
that Greecehad no objection with Macedonia calling itself
Macedonia. Greek children were taught in school that one
of the republics inYugoslavia was called “Macedonia” and
the people living in it spoke “Macedonian”. When
Yugoslavia disintegrated, the Serbian occupied part of
Macedonia became the sovereign and independent state the
Republic of Macedonia.
Greece and Bulgaria in the meantime continue to illegally
occupy Macedonian territories and refuse to acknowledge
the existence of ethnic Macedonians.
Sadly for Greece and Bulgaria, Macedonians do exist and
are re-opening the Macedonian question. The days of
imperialism and treating people like raw material for
Nation Building are over. Macedonians don’t want to be
Greeks or Bulgarians or any other names Greece and
Bulgaria feels like calling them. The Macedonians want to
be called Macedonians. They want to be recognized for who
they are. The new Macedonian questions should be about
recognizing Macedonians as a separate ethnic identity with
rights and privileges in accordance with international
norms. The new Macedonian question should be about
restitution and correcting past wrongs. It should be about
long overdue repatriation of long forgotten citizens.
I believe it is time to re-examine the facts, re-open the
1913 Treaty of Bucharest and all associated treaties that
have to do with human and minority rights as well as with
land claim rights that Greece and Bulgaria have violated.
It’s time to stop the pursuit of fantasy like the name
dispute and face reality like how and under what
conditions Macedonia was occupied, partitioned and
annexed. It’s time to review the atrocities the Greek and
Bulgarian states have committed against the Macedonian
population in 1912 and 1913 and from 1940 to 1949. It’s
time for Greece to start making plans to repatriate the
Macedonian citizens it evicted for no good reason. It’s
time for Greece and Bulgaria to recognize those
Macedonians living in their states as Macedonians with
full rights and privileges in accordance with
international law.
Mr. Karamanlis, its time to stop stalling and muddying the
waters by one day pretending there are no Macedonians in
your country and another day saying everyone who lives in
your country is Macedonian and Greek. Mr. Karamanlis it’s
time for you and your Government to start facing real
issues like providing human and national rights to the
minorities that live in your country today not 2,400 years
ago.
Since Macedonians are refusing to “go away” it’s time for
you Mr. Karamanlis to deal with them in a civilized and
equitable manner.
Mr. Karamanlis, the next time you feel like making
statements about how the Macedonians are stealing your
“Greek heritage”, please take a good look at your own
Greek nation and how it was created and decide for
yourself who is stealing whose heritage!
|